Videos in Google Search Results

Various sources are reporting that Google is getting ready to launch a brand spanking new ad format that’ll allow UK AdWords users to integrate videos into their sponsored search listings. Pretty snazzy.

These video extensions are currently in beta in the USA, and although Google haven’t made any concrete statement about when they’ll see general release / UK functionality, it can’t be too far off (depending, of course, on them going down well in the USA). This new feature follows on recent extensions of the amount of information displayed in paid search listings, as Google brings together more and more features. AdWords listings are becoming increasingly diverse and increasingly information-rich, as are organic SERPs.

Now, down to brass tacks: how much will it cost? Apparently, Google will be charging the maximum CPC of the ads’ keywords per 10 seconds of video. So that’s not an insignificant amount, especially on campaigns that are getting a lot of impressions.

Apparently, the videos will play in expandable plusboxes underneath the classic text ads we all know and love. So, like Google’s current “hover-over” page shots for organic results, it’s a chance for Google users to get more content before clicking through. We’ll be interested to see what effect a little added rich media has to CTRs. What do you think? Let us know in the comments.

Facebook Questions

Facebook has put a new service into beta: Facebook Questions. Broadly speaking, it’s a way of crowd-sourcing answers to your queries, no matter how specific (or inane). Pose a question in much the same way as you’d update your status, and it’ll be displayed to your friends, their friends, and any other Facebook users who’ve declared an interest in that topic.

Take it away blog.facebook.com:

To help us show your question to the most relevant people and ensure the best answers, you can tag it with a specific topic. For instance, if you have a question about what type of camera you should buy, you could tag it with “Photography.” If you want to find the best bike routes in the area, you might tag it with “Cycling.”… The questions you ask will be shown to people who have expressed interest in the particular topics you tag.”

It’s a user-generated development; Facebook have spotted a pattern in usage – “Millions of people ask their friends questions on Facebook every day” says Blake Ross on the official Facebook blog – and have developed a feature reflecting that pattern.

Here are some Facebook Questions questions:

Has Yahoo! Answers come to mind yet? It’s a good example of the shortfalls of expecting answers from the internet. Wikipedia works because it’s moderated; will Facebook Answers be compromised by its open nature? Only time will tell. There’s been some discussion of Facebook Questions as a replacement for Google as the go-to for quick answers. Can the massed expertise of Facebook users rival Google’s algorithim? Answers in the comments please…

AdWords and Trademarks

The spat between Google and Louis Vuitton continues, and at the moment it looks to be going in Vuitton’s favour. Despite a ruling back in march that Google had not infringed trademark rights by allowing Adwords users to bid on the Vuitton brand name, the French Supreme Court has decided that Google are liable. Next stop: the Paris Court of Appeals.

What are the potential repercussions of Louis Vuitton’s campaign to have exclusive rights to “Louis Vuitton” as keywords? Google said this back in March:

“We believe that user interest is best served by maximizing the choice of keywords, ensuring relevant and informative advertising for a wide variety of different contexts,”

They’re clearly of the opinion that limiting certain keywords to the use of those who’ve trademarked them could compromise AdWords as a whole:

“Some companies want to limit choice for users by extending trademark law to encompass the use of keywords in online advertising. Ultimately they want to be able to exercise greater control over the information available to users by preventing other companies from advertising”

And they’re confident that their AdWords anti-counterfeit-goods policies are enough to deal with the problem of knock-off goods being advertised as genuine on Google. At the moment, trademark owners can report individual sites for infringing trademarks, and it seems that as far as Google are concerned, that’s enough. This is bolstered by a mid-July update to AdWords policy, extending the prohibition of implying affiliation through deceptive business names.

Since the French Supreme Court’s decision, however, it seems that the argument is going to continue for a while yet.

Louis Vuitton claims the judgement will “ensure greater legal certainty to the benefit of both businesses and consumers operating online”.

Debate About Twitter Search.

There’s an interesting article over on the Guardian’s digital content blog today. It’s reacting to the news that Twitter is serving more search queries monthly than Yahoo and Bing combined. Specifically, that’s around 800m search queries on Twitter a day.

As the Guardian blog is quick to point out, there are big differences between searching on Twitter and searching via Google or other search providers. Twitter indexes very differently from Google’s Caffeine or the indexing algorithms used by other search providers.

So, Twitter and Google will deliver very different results. The helpful example given in the Guardian blog explains further:

“If I want to find out what people are saying about the World Cup right now, I might search Twitter… But if I want to find fixture lists, stadia capacity and previous tournament winners, I’m going to Google.”

So, Google, for example, will offer a much more sophisticated field of search results, whereas Twitter allows up-to-the-minute monitoring of conversations occurring across the social web (turning up Tweets containing links to posts on Posterous, Facebook pages, photographs on Tumblr, etc.)

Twitter’s Biz Stone, quoted in the Guardian article, is aware of this difference:

“Searching the web – …is about I, me, I’m asking the search engine to give me something – and when you are on Twitter, you are open to information that’s coming to you.”

That’s an important point of the argument; what search services deliver defines how people use them. People are increasingly search savvy. With Google integrating real-time results on to SERPs, would it be worthwhile for Twitter to try and offer a more sophisticated search? Answers in the comments please…

Google Analytics: Benchmarking.

There’s no 100% accurate way of comparing your website’s performance metrics against those of your competitors. When managing your website analytics, arguably the best way of getting some contextual information is Google Analytics Benchmarking.

Benchmarking allows users to compare key metrics such as visits, page-views, pages per visits, and bounce rate with an average value that’s been generated from data provided by other Google Analytics users. The Benchmarking feature will display your data on a line-graph; the graph will also feature a line indicating the average result for that metric for other websites within your industry.

Because you can select which category your website falls into from a hefty list of options, the Benchmarking average you see should be reasonably contextually valid. Google further focuses the Benchmark by splitting websites into three categories (small, medium, and large) depending on the amount of visitors they receives; you should be presented with an average that reflects the size of your web presence.

Why Use It?

Remember that because the Benchmarking line represents an average, it’ll be affected by erroneous results within the analytics data that it’s drawn from. So a few sites with unusually high or low bounce rates, for example, could skew the average seen by other Benchmarking users.

While Benchmarking isn’t an authoritative source for competitor analysis, it is a useful tool for rating your site’s metrics against something other than previous performance. Use it to identify opportunities for improvement, spark strategy, and inspire site development.

Accessing Google Analytics Benchmarking:

All analytics data used in Benchmarking is anonymous, and you have to agree to share your data in order to access the Benchmarking service.

To activate Benchmarking, you need to agree to share your analytics data “.Anonymously with Google and others” in your Data Sharing Settings. You can access this either via your over-arching account settings, or, if you’re setting up a new account, at the Accept User Agreement page; the option you need to agree to is below the Google Analytics Terms Of Service. Then you can overlay the Benchmarking line on your data visualisations by clicking on the ‘Benchmarking’ tab in the visitors section of Google Analytics. Benchmarking can be used no matter which version of the tracking code is installed to your Google Analytics account.

« Older Posts «   

Not sure how to increase sales?

Get in touch, you soon will be!

Request a Call Back